<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FFTH: Fiber From the House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/2008/11/fiber-from-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/2008/11/fiber-from-the-house/</link>
	<description>The Musings of an Expatriate in European Communications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:52:00 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kennethrcarter</title>
		<link>http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/2008/11/fiber-from-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator>kennethrcarter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/?p=44#comment-81</guid>
		<description>Brian,  you raise an interesting question about the architecture of the fiber access network, whether it is passive or active. This is probably not a decision best left to the consumer.   I am personally a fan of active architectures (AON).  I think that they offer better CAPEX vs. OPEX performance and offer the best &quot;future-proofing&quot;.  However, offering a either a passive or active architecture would do little to change the value proposition of FFTH.  However, offering a passive architecture, would leave open the option of selling an upgraded product further down the line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,  you raise an interesting question about the architecture of the fiber access network, whether it is passive or active. This is probably not a decision best left to the consumer.   I am personally a fan of active architectures (AON).  I think that they offer better CAPEX vs. OPEX performance and offer the best &#8220;future-proofing&#8221;.  However, offering a either a passive or active architecture would do little to change the value proposition of FFTH.  However, offering a passive architecture, would leave open the option of selling an upgraded product further down the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Savin</title>
		<link>http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/2008/11/fiber-from-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Savin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 13:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/?p=44#comment-76</guid>
		<description>What about G-PON?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about G-PON?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Communications Insights: Trends and Cool Stuff &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marketing FFTH</title>
		<link>http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/2008/11/fiber-from-the-house/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Communications Insights: Trends and Cool Stuff &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Marketing FFTH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 20:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kennethrcarter.com/CoolStuff/?p=44#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] Communications Insights: Trends and Cool Stuff The Musings of an Expatriate in European Communications      &#171; FFTH: Fiber From the House [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Communications Insights: Trends and Cool Stuff The Musings of an Expatriate in European Communications      &laquo; FFTH: Fiber From the House [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

